Countries where authors publish in Standards in Genomic Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Standards in Genomic Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Standards in Genomic Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Standards in Genomic Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Standards in Genomic Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in Standards in Genomic Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Standards in Genomic Sciences.
About Standards in Genomic Sciences
The 580 papers published in Standards in Genomic Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 11.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Standards in Genomic Sciences usually cover Ecology (267 papers), Endocrinology (40 papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (48 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (424 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (203 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (67 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (54 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (47 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (44 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (38 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Standards in Genomic Sciences are Hans‐Peter Klenk, Markus Göker, Alexander F. Auch, Mathias von Jan, Didier Raoult, Pierre‐Edouard Fournier, Jean‐Christophe Lagier, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Catherine Robert and Ajay Kumar Mishra.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.