Countries where authors publish in Microbial Physiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microbial Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microbial Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microbial Physiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Microbial Physiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Microbial Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microbial Physiology.
About Microbial Physiology
The 716 papers published in Microbial Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 19.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Microbial Physiology usually cover Biotechnology (65 papers), Molecular Biology (458 papers), Genetics (183 papers), Microbiology (38 papers) and Molecular Medicine (30 papers) specifically the topics of Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (165 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (81 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (75 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (74 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (66 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (53 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (52 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microbial Physiology are Milton H. Saier, Frédéric Leroy, Luc De Vuyst, Linda L. McCarter, François-Joël Gatesoupe, Julia M. Foght, James B. Russell, Alain J. Cozzone, Matthias Boll and Hideaki Yukawa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.