Forrest L. Dimmick

513 total citations
10 papers, 77 citations indexed

About

Forrest L. Dimmick is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Forrest L. Dimmick has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 77 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Forrest L. Dimmick's work include Color Science and Applications (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers) and Color perception and design (3 papers). Forrest L. Dimmick is often cited by papers focused on Color Science and Applications (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers) and Color perception and design (3 papers). Forrest L. Dimmick collaborates with scholars based in United States. Forrest L. Dimmick's co-authors include S. M. Luria, M. H. Siegel and Ira M. Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and The American Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Forrest L. Dimmick

9 papers receiving 63 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Forrest L. Dimmick United States	6	51	42	39	8	7	10	77
LeGrand H. Hardy United States	3	40 0.8×	29 0.7×	34 0.9×	9 1.1×	16 2.3×	3	102
Gertrude Rand United States	2	39 0.8×	26 0.6×	23 0.6×	8 1.0×	8 1.1×	2	79
Kenneth Craik United States	3	65 1.3×	25 0.6×	11 0.3×	10 1.3×	5 0.7×	3	91
G. C. Grindley United Kingdom	6	134 2.6×	16 0.4×	24 0.6×	33 4.1×	13 1.9×	9	151
Michael J. Zigler United States	7	74 1.5×	29 0.7×	12 0.3×	2 0.3×	32 4.6×	12	111
B. H. Crawford United Kingdom	5	40 0.8×	64 1.5×	40 1.0×		1 0.1×	9	95
Justin Broackes United States	7	60 1.2×	22 0.5×	49 1.3×	50 6.3×		17	118
Elizabeth Cheresh Allen United States	5	18 0.4×	12 0.3×	20 0.5×	14 1.8×		17	66
A. H. Munsell	3	7 0.1×	11 0.3×	15 0.4×	7 0.9×		3	34
Dean Farnsworth United Kingdom	3	14 0.3×	8 0.2×	2 0.1×	2 0.3×	1 0.1×	5	53

Countries citing papers authored by Forrest L. Dimmick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest L. Dimmick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest L. Dimmick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest L. Dimmick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest L. Dimmick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest L. Dimmick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest L. Dimmick. The network helps show where Forrest L. Dimmick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Forrest L. Dimmick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Forrest L. Dimmick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Forrest L. Dimmick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Forrest L. Dimmick. Forrest L. Dimmick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Dimmick, Forrest L.. (1965). Color specification based on just noticeable differences of hue. Vision Research. 5(12). 679–694. 5 indexed citations

2.

Siegel, M. H. & Forrest L. Dimmick. (1962). Discrimination of Color II Sensitivity as a Function of Spectral Wavelength, 510 to 630 mμ*. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 52(9). 1071–1071. 18 indexed citations

3.

Dimmick, Forrest L., et al.. (1961). A study of binocular color mixture. Vision Research. 1(1-2). 108–120. 27 indexed citations

4.

Schwartz, Ira M. & Forrest L. Dimmick. (1958). COMPARISON OF HIGH ACUITY SCORES ON SNELLEN AND ORTHO-RATER TESTS. Optometry and Vision Science. 35(6). 309–313. 1 indexed citations

5.

Dimmick, Forrest L., et al.. (1958). How Red Is Red?. The American Journal of Psychology. 71(1). 298–298. 5 indexed citations

6.

Dimmick, Forrest L., et al.. (1957). Measurement of the Light Adaptation of the Rods. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 47(5). 391–391. 5 indexed citations

7.

Dimmick, Forrest L.. (1956). Specifications and Calibration of the 1953 Edition of the Inter-Society Color Council Color Aptitude Test. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 46(6). 389–389. 8 indexed citations

8.

Dimmick, Forrest L., et al.. (1955). Effects of Exposure to Various Red Lights upon Subsequent Dark Adaptation Measured by the Method of Constant Stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 45(7). 502–502. 5 indexed citations

9.

Dimmick, Forrest L., et al.. (1953). The Facilitative Effect of Red Light on Dark Adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 43(6). 541–541. 2 indexed citations

10.

Dimmick, Forrest L., et al.. (1951). New photographic processing unit.. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 41(11). 868. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact