Countries where authors publish in Seminars in Hematology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seminars in Hematology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seminars in Hematology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seminars in Hematology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Seminars in Hematology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Seminars in Hematology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seminars in Hematology.
About Seminars in Hematology
The 1.5k papers published in Seminars in Hematology in the last decades have received a total of 39.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Seminars in Hematology usually cover Hematology (941 papers), Genetics (473 papers) and Internal Medicine (59 papers) specifically the topics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (210 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (205 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (197 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (170 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (162 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (154 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (145 papers) and Blood groups and transfusion (138 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seminars in Hematology are George J. Weiner, Mary Cushman, Steven N. Goodman, Robert McMillan, Kenneth C. Anderson, Kushang V. Patel, Tomas Ganz, Ching‐Hon Pui, Maria Domenica Cappellini and Christian Breymann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.