The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

49.4k citations
2.1k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

    • Diabetes Management and Education 784
    • Diabetes Management and Research 469
    • Diabetes Treatment and Management 82
    • Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients 79
    • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins 78
    • Obesity and Health Practices 80

The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

1.5k papers receiving 35.8k citations

Peers

The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 25.2k
  • Family Practice 1.4k
  • Pharmacy 2.2k
  • General Health Professions 9.6k
  • Speech and Hearing 1.5k
Replace Health Technology Assessment with:
Health Technology Assessment United Kingdom
The Annals of Family Medicine United States
Controlled Clinical Trials United States
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine United States
Preventing Chronic Disease United States
Research in Nursing & Health United States
Patient Preference and Adherence United States
Journal of Nursing Scholarship United States
Contemporary Clinical Trials United States
Health Expectations United Kingdom
The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care relative to Health Technology Assessment United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Health Technology Assessment · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care.

About The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

The 2.1k papers published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care in the last decades have received a total of 49.4k indexed citations . Papers published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.2k papers), Pharmacy (84 papers), Family Practice (29 papers), General Health Professions (281 papers) and Speech and Hearing (47 papers) specifically the topics of Diabetes Management and Education (784 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (469 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (95 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (92 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (82 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (80 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (79 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care are Martha M. Funnell, Robert M. Anderson, Mark F. Peyrot, Sharon A. Brown, Linda M. Siminerio, David G. Marrero, Peggy Soule Odegard, Richard R. Rubin, Russell E. Glasgow and Margaret J. Grey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact