Studies in American Indian Literatures

315 papers and 562 indexed citations i.

About

The 315 papers published in Studies in American Indian Literatures in the last decades have received a total of 562 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in American Indian Literatures usually cover Health (85 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (79 papers) and Cultural Studies (56 papers) specifically the topics of Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (85 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (35 papers) and Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in American Indian Literatures are Angela M. Haas, Qwo-Li Driskill, Anthony K. Webster, Craig S. Womack, Jodi A. Byrd, Mark Rifkin, Chadwick Allen, Robert M. Nelson, Daniel Heath Justice and Sophie Mayer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in American Indian Literatures

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in American Indian Literatures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in American Indian Literatures.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in American Indian Literatures

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in American Indian Literatures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in American Indian Literatures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in American Indian Literatures more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025