Artibus et Historiae

309 papers and 347 indexed citations i.

About

The 309 papers published in Artibus et Historiae in the last decades have received a total of 347 indexed citations. Papers published in Artibus et Historiae usually cover History (177 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (107 papers) and Classics (73 papers) specifically the topics of Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (113 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (75 papers) and Architecture and Art History Studies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Artibus et Historiae are Jamés S. Ackerman, Leo Steinberg, Deborah Howard, Joseph Gutmann, James Elkins, Edward J. Olszewski, Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier, Moshe Barasch, David Alan Brown and Creighton Gilbert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Artibus et Historiae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Artibus et Historiae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Artibus et Historiae.

Countries where authors publish in Artibus et Historiae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Artibus et Historiae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Artibus et Historiae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Artibus et Historiae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025