Science & Technology Libraries

806 papers and 4.6k indexed citations

About

The 806 papers published in Science & Technology Libraries in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Science & Technology Libraries usually cover Information Systems (342 papers), Library and Information Sciences (155 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (79 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (150 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (142 papers) and Web and Library Services (121 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science & Technology Libraries are Heidi Blackburn, Tony Stankus, Thomas E. Pinelli, Barbara P. Buttenfield, Cecelia Brown, Lisl Zach, Joseph R. Kraus, Robert Tomaszewski, Preeti Mulay and Kate Manuel.

In The Last Decade

Science & Technology Libraries

596 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Science & Technology Libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science & Technology Libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science & Technology Libraries.

Countries where authors publish in Science & Technology Libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science & Technology Libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science & Technology Libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science & Technology Libraries more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026