Irish Political Studies

742 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 742 papers published in Irish Political Studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Irish Political Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (579 papers), Political Science and International Relations (343 papers) and History (67 papers) specifically the topics of Irish and British Studies (527 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (134 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Irish Political Studies are Jennifer Todd, Eoin O’Malley, David M. Farrell, Kenneth Benoit, Jane Suiter, John Coakley, Michael Marsh, Michael Laver, Michael Gallagher and Stephen Quinlan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Irish Political Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Irish Political Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Irish Political Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Irish Political Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Irish Political Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Irish Political Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irish Political Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025