Reviews in Analytical Chemistry

436 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 436 papers published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry usually cover Analytical Chemistry (143 papers), Spectroscopy (129 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (87 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (83 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (78 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry are Y. K. Agrawal, Danny K.Y. Wong, Chenxu Yu, Yizhak Marcus, Israël Schechter, Ignas Kenfack Tonlé, Sabine Szunerits, Rabah Boukherroub, Frants R. Lauritsen and Tapio Kotiaho.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews in Analytical Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews in Analytical Chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025