Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward
20122.3k citationsJames Aronson, Montserrat Vilà et al.profile →
Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order
20061.4k citationsRichard J. Hobbs, Salvatore Aricò et al.Global Ecology and Biogeographyprofile →
International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition
2019949 citationsJames Aronson, Cristián Echeverría et al.Restoration Ecologyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of James Aronson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Aronson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Aronson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Aronson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Aronson. The network helps show where James Aronson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Aronson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Aronson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Aronson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Aronson. James Aronson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pérez, Daniel Vidal, et al.. (2021). Filling gaps on seed germination and species selection in drylands of Argentina: Work in progress and reflections on intelligent tinkering.2 indexed citations
Aronson, James, Daniel Renison, Orlando Rangel, et al.. (2007). Restauración del Capital Natural: sin reservas no hay bienes ni servicios. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(3). 15–24.8 indexed citations
14.
Hobbs, Richard J., Salvatore Aricò, James Aronson, et al.. (2006). Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 15(1). 1–7.1417 indexed citations breakdown →
Ovalle, Carlos, et al.. (1997). Características fenológicas y productivas de 34 accesiones de hualputra (Medicago polymorpha) colectadas en la zona mediterránea de Chile. 57(4). 261–271.9 indexed citations
17.
Ovalle, Carlos, et al.. (1993). Rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in central Chile and its relevance to the arid "Norte Chico". Revista chilena de historia natural. 66(3). 291–303.7 indexed citations
18.
Aronson, James, et al.. (1993). Alfalfa arborea o tagasaste ( chamaecytisus proliferus spp palmensis ) , un arbol forrajero leguminoso con potencial para sistema agrosilvopastorales en chile mediterraneo. 53(3). 264–271.2 indexed citations
19.
Aronson, James. (1990). Desert Plants of Use and Charm from Northern Chile. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 10(2). 65–86.8 indexed citations
20.
Aronson, James. (1972). Deadline for the media : today's challenges to press, TV and radio.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.