John M. Koch

2.2k citations
50 papers · 1.8k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Koch

50 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John M. Koch
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 991
  • Forestry 242
  • Soil Science 342
  • Ecology 799
  • Global and Planetary Change 470
Replace Mario E. Biondini with:
Mario E. Biondini United States
V. Pavlů Czechia
Adrián Ares United States
Carlos Ovalle Chile
Surendra P. Singh India
Shin‐ichiro Aiba Japan
Kimberly J. La Pierre United States
O. W. Van Auken United States
Gerrit W. Heil Netherlands
Luciana F. Alves Brazil
John M. Koch relative to Mario E. Biondini United States Mario E. Biondini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Mario E. Biondini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Koch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Koch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Koch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Koch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Koch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Koch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Koch. The network helps show where John M. Koch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Koch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Koch Line = papers co-authored together John M. Koch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997149
2 2007138
3 2007131
4 200690
5 200782
6 199669
7 198069
8 200563
9 200461
10 199452
11 200751
12 199651
13 199749
14 199649
15 201248
16 200639
17 200037
18 201536
19 199734
20 199733

About John M. Koch

John M. Koch is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Forestry, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (26 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (16 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (8 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (6 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (5 papers) and Seedling growth and survival studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (991 citations), Forestry (242 citations), Soil Science (342 citations), Ecology (799 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (470 citations). John M. Koch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include S. C. Ward, C. D. Grant, Kingsley W. Dixon, David T. Bell, Richard J. Hobbs, Carl D. Grant, William A. Loneragan, Jonathan Majer, Matthew I. Daws and Melinda L. Moir. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Australian Forestry, Australian Journal of Botany, Forest Ecology and Management and Journal of Insect Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact