Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material
474 papers
receiving
3.7k citations
Peers
Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
Conservation2.1k
Archeology3.4k
Earth-Surface Processes2.1k
Biomaterials1.5k
Space and Planetary Science81
Replace npj Materials Degradation with:
npj Materials DegradationChina
International Journal of Applied Glass ScienceUnited States
Gems & GemologyUnited States
Journal of Coatings TechnologyUnited States
Corrosion ReviewsChina
Ge-conservacionSpain
ArchéoSciencesFrance
The Journal of Advanced ProsthodonticsSouth Korea
Laser ChemistryUnited States
Nexus Network JournalItaly
Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Materialrelative tonpj Materials DegradationChinanpj Materials Degradation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.4×
npj Materials Degradation · 1×
×142k/149CONSE
×113k/305ARCHE
×3.42k/616EP
×1.31k/1kBIOMA
×2081/4SPS
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material
This network shows the impact of papers published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material.
About Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material
The 590 papers published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material usually cover Conservation (249 papers), Space and Planetary Science (45 papers), Archeology (316 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (126 papers) and Biomaterials (71 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (281 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (230 papers), Building materials and conservation (126 papers), Material Properties and Processing (87 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (65 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (45 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (33 papers) and Lignin and Wood Chemistry (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material are Jana Kolar, Paolo Calvini, Andrea Gorassini, Gerhard Banik, Paul M. Whitmore, Spiros Zervos, Anne‐Laurence Dupont, Marina Bicchieri, Altaf H. Basta and Marianna Adamo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.