The Cambridge Quarterly

459 papers and 732 indexed citations i.

About

The 459 papers published in The Cambridge Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 732 indexed citations. Papers published in The Cambridge Quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (169 papers), History (49 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (45 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (35 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (26 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Cambridge Quarterly are Ruth Ahnert, Paul Robins, David Gervais, David Ellis, Susan Manning, Ato Quayson, Jennifer Wallace, Leland de la Durantaye, Philip J. Davis and John Stone.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Cambridge Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Cambridge Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Cambridge Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The Cambridge Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Cambridge Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Cambridge Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Cambridge Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025