Records of Natural Products

636 papers and 5.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 636 papers published in Records of Natural Products in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Records of Natural Products usually cover Plant Science (292 papers), Molecular Biology (263 papers) and Food Science (178 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (159 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (137 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Records of Natural Products are İlhami Gülçın, Ahmet C. Gören, K. Hüsnü Can Başer, Meryem Topal, Nada M. Mostafa, Khalijah Awang, Betül Demırcı, Pınar Kalın, Majid Mohammadhosseini and Adeolu Alex Adedapo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Records of Natural Products

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Records of Natural Products. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Records of Natural Products.

Countries where authors publish in Records of Natural Products

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Records of Natural Products. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Records of Natural Products with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Records of Natural Products more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025