Records Management Journal

492 papers and 4.6k indexed citations

About

The 492 papers published in Records Management Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Records Management Journal usually cover Conservation (283 papers), Information Systems (100 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (87 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (278 papers), Data Quality and Management (68 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Records Management Journal are Victoria L. Lemieux, Julie McLeod, Brendan E. Asogwa, Elizabeth Lomas, Jóhanna Gunnlaugsdóttir, Frank Upward, Justus Wamukoya, Mpho Ngoepe, Elizabeth Shepherd and Shadrack Katuu.

In The Last Decade

Records Management Journal

416 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Countries where authors publish in Records Management Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Records Management Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Records Management Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Records Management Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Records Management Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Records Management Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Records Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026