The Review of Diabetic Studies

377 papers and 10.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 377 papers published in The Review of Diabetic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Review of Diabetic Studies usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (192 papers), Surgery (146 papers) and Genetics (116 papers) specifically the topics of Pancreatic Islet Dysfunction and Regeneration (119 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (100 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Review of Diabetic Studies are Angelika C. Gruessner, Theodosios D. Filippatos, Moses Elisaf, Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos, Thalia Panagiotopoulou, Charles Sia, Bernard E. Tuch, Vijayaganapathy Vaithilingam, Vasilios G. Athyros and Κωνσταντίνος Τζιόμαλος.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Review of Diabetic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Review of Diabetic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Review of Diabetic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Review of Diabetic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Review of Diabetic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Review of Diabetic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Review of Diabetic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025