Respiratory Care

3.0k papers and 45.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Respiratory Care in the last decades have received a total of 45.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Respiratory Care usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.4k papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (541 papers) and Emergency Medicine (524 papers) specifically the topics of Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1.5k papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (703 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (438 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Respiratory Care are Dean Hess, Richard H Kallet, Masaji Nishimura, Neil R. MacIntyre, Richard D. Branson, Robert M. Kacmarek, Dennis Williams, Rachael Parke, Shay McGuinness and Ruben D Restrepo.

In The Last Decade

Respiratory Care

2.7k papers receiving 40.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Respiratory Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Respiratory Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Respiratory Care.

Countries where authors publish in Respiratory Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Respiratory Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Respiratory Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Respiratory Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026