Pediatric Pulmonology

7.7k papers and 146.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.7k papers published in Pediatric Pulmonology in the last decades have received a total of 146.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Pediatric Pulmonology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (6.1k papers), Physiology (1.8k papers) and Surgery (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2.8k papers), Therapeutic Advances in Cystic Fibrosis Research (1.6k papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pediatric Pulmonology are Andrew Bush, Hans Bisgaard, Michael W. Konstan, Peter D. Sly, Anne B. Chang, David Gozal, Margaret Rosenfeld, Harm A.W.M. Tiddens, Bonnie W. Ramsey and Félix Ratjen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pediatric Pulmonology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pediatric Pulmonology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pediatric Pulmonology.

Countries where authors publish in Pediatric Pulmonology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pediatric Pulmonology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pediatric Pulmonology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pediatric Pulmonology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025