Quality Technology & Quantitative Management

9.0k citations
738 papers · · active since 2004

Impact in

Papers in

Quality Technology & Quantitative Management

647 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

Quality Technology & Quantitative Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 3.8k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1.4k
  • Management Information Systems 1.4k
  • Statistics and Probability 561
  • Management Science and Operations Research 283
Replace International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering with:
International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering India
IISE Transactions United States
Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering Taiwan
Springer series in reliability engineering United States
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics United Kingdom
Quality progress United States
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering United Kingdom
Industrial Engineering & Management Systems South Korea
Optimization and Engineering United States
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making China
Quality Technology & Quantitative Management relative to International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering India International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.6×
International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality Technology & Quantitative Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management.

About Quality Technology & Quantitative Management

The 738 papers published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (277 papers), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (135 papers), Management Information Systems (124 papers), Statistics and Probability (62 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (44 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (272 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (135 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (108 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (56 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (36 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (15 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (7 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (5 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality Technology & Quantitative Management are Philippe Castagliola, Stelios Psarakis, Gemai Chen, Gautam Choudhury, Jinting Wang, Christian H. Weiß, Madhu Jain, Muhammad Riaz, Lingyun Zhang and Giovanni Celano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact