Quality progress

532 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 532 papers published in Quality progress in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality progress usually cover Management Information Systems (36 papers), Strategy and Management (22 papers) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (14 papers) specifically the topics of Quality and Supply Management (28 papers), Quality and Management Systems (16 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality progress are I. Elaine Allen, James J. Rooney, Bengt Klefsjö, James M. Lucas, Ronald D. Snee, Søren Bisgaard, Kevin McCormack, Christopher D. Chapman, Philip B. Crosby and Jeroen de Mast.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality progress

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality progress.

Countries where authors publish in Quality progress

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality progress more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025