Quaestiones Mathematicae

1.7k papers and 7.8k indexed citations

About

The 1.7k papers published in Quaestiones Mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Quaestiones Mathematicae usually cover Mathematical Physics (620 papers), Geometry and Topology (609 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (550 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topics in Algebra (286 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (281 papers) and Advanced Banach Space Theory (278 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaestiones Mathematicae are Gunther Jäger, Bernhard Banaschewski, Bin Pang, P. G. L. Leach, Michael D. Plummer, S.E. Rodabaugh, F. M. Mahomed, Marion Scheepers, Aleš Pultr and Michael A. Henning.

In The Last Decade

Quaestiones Mathematicae

1.3k papers receiving 7.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Quaestiones Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaestiones Mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaestiones Mathematicae.

Countries where authors publish in Quaestiones Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaestiones Mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaestiones Mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaestiones Mathematicae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026