Quaestiones Geographicae

219 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 219 papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae usually cover Water Science and Technology (55 papers), Atmospheric Science (38 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (37 papers) specifically the topics of Integrated Water Resources Management (52 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (28 papers) and Polish socio-economic development (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaestiones Geographicae are Jan Hauke, Tomasz Kossowski, Olav Slaymaker, Muh Aris Marfai, Dariusz Wrzesiński, Michael F. Thomas, Irene Maria Bollati, Manuela Pelfini, Zbigniew Zwoliński and Grzegorz Rachlewicz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae.

Countries where authors publish in Quaestiones Geographicae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaestiones Geographicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaestiones Geographicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaestiones Geographicae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025