Michael F. Thomas

4.5k total citations
165 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Michael F. Thomas is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael F. Thomas has authored 165 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 52 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 41 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Michael F. Thomas's work include Magnetic properties of thin films (32 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (31 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (26 papers). Michael F. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic properties of thin films (32 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (31 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (26 papers). Michael F. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Spain. Michael F. Thomas's co-authors include Mark T. Weller, C. E. Johnson, Frank J. Berry, Martin Thorp, Sandra E. Dann, D.B. Currie, Piotr Migoń, Steven A. Skinner, Peter R. Slater and Jonathan Nott and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Advanced Materials.

In The Last Decade

Michael F. Thomas

159 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael F. Thomas United Kingdom 35 1.3k 1.2k 783 654 491 165 3.6k
David Walker United States 59 1.4k 1.1× 1.7k 1.5× 958 1.2× 965 1.5× 188 0.4× 233 11.0k
Gilberto Artioli Italy 47 835 0.7× 2.8k 2.4× 201 0.3× 223 0.3× 734 1.5× 323 7.9k
Peter J. Heaney United States 42 1.3k 1.0× 1.7k 1.5× 1.2k 1.5× 333 0.5× 164 0.3× 132 6.5k
Jean Susini France 45 256 0.2× 1.2k 1.0× 226 0.3× 554 0.8× 1.1k 2.3× 184 7.6k
Jeffrey E. Post United States 44 1.3k 1.0× 2.4k 2.1× 608 0.8× 329 0.5× 188 0.4× 138 8.3k
David R. Veblen United States 48 1.3k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 1.2k 1.5× 352 0.5× 126 0.3× 143 6.6k
Alicia Durán Spain 55 437 0.3× 6.0k 5.2× 137 0.2× 298 0.5× 438 0.9× 348 9.6k
J. Frederick W. Mosselmans United Kingdom 44 425 0.3× 2.0k 1.8× 269 0.3× 281 0.4× 103 0.2× 223 6.7k
Feng Wu China 35 578 0.5× 1.6k 1.4× 62 0.1× 1.3k 1.9× 377 0.8× 136 4.7k
G.G. Roberts United Kingdom 39 671 0.5× 1.5k 1.3× 80 0.1× 743 1.1× 650 1.3× 181 5.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael F. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael F. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael F. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael F. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael F. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael F. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael F. Thomas. The network helps show where Michael F. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael F. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael F. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael F. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael F. Thomas. Michael F. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Boon, David, et al.. (2019). The 2017 Regent Landslide, Freetown Peninsula, Sierra Leone. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 52(4). 435–444. 12 indexed citations
3.
Marco, José F., et al.. (2017). Synthesis and magnetic characterisation of Fe1−xMgxSb2O4 (x = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75) and their oxygen-excess derivatives, Fe1−xMgxSb2O4+y. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 5(20). 4985–4995. 5 indexed citations
4.
Clemens, Oliver, José F. Marco, Michael F. Thomas, et al.. (2016). Magnetic interactions in cubic-, hexagonal- and trigonal-barium iron oxide fluoride, BaFeO2F. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 28(34). 346001–346001. 6 indexed citations
5.
Thomas, Olivier, et al.. (2014). Revealing organic carbon–nitrate linear relationship from UV spectra of freshwaters in agricultural environment. Chemosphere. 107. 115–120. 7 indexed citations
6.
Figuera, Juan de la, et al.. (2013). Synthesis and characterisation of the n=2 Ruddlesden–Popper phases Ln2Sr(Ba)Fe2O7 (Ln=La, Nd, Eu). Materials Research Bulletin. 48(9). 3537–3544. 22 indexed citations
7.
Archibald, Stephen J., Stephen L. Atkin, Wim Bras, et al.. (2013). How does iron interact with sporopollenin exine capsules? An X-ray absorption study including microfocus XANES and XRF imaging. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2(8). 945–959. 21 indexed citations
8.
Bayliss, Ryan D., Frank J. Berry, C. Greaves, et al.. (2012). Magnetic interaction in ferrous antimonite, FeSb2O4, and some derivatives. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 24(27). 276001–276001. 6 indexed citations
9.
Berry, Frank J., Fiona C. Coomer, Elaine A. Moore, et al.. (2009). Fluorination of perovskite-related phases of composition SrFe1−xSnxO3−δ. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 21(25). 256001–256001. 19 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, Michael F., et al.. (2006). Supply Chain Management: Monitoring Strategic Partnering Contracts with Activity-Based Measures. Management accounting quarterly. 8(1). 1. 2 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Michael F.. (2003). Extreme events in the context of late Quaternary environmental change. Geographia Polonica. 76(2). 1 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, Michael F.. (2003). Landscape sensitivity to rapid environmental change—a Quaternary perspective with examples from tropical areas. CATENA. 55(2). 107–124. 57 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Bernard, Alice V. Turkington, & Michael F. Thomas. (2002). Introduction: The interpretation and significance of weathering mantles. CATENA. 49. 1–4. 1 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Michael F., et al.. (2002). Proceedings of the International Conference on the Applications of the Mössbauer Effect, (ICAME 2001) September 2-7, 2001, Oxford, U.K.. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks. 2 indexed citations
15.
Holland, D., Mark E. Smith, I. J. F. Poplett, et al.. (2001). Tin germanate glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 293-295. 175–181. 11 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Michael F., et al.. (1999). Management Accounting: A Road of Discovery. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, Jacqueline A., C. E. Johnson, & Michael F. Thomas. (1987). A Mossbauer effect study of the magnetic phase diagram and spin wave excitations in the antiferromagnet Cs2FeCl5.H2O. Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics. 20(1). 91–109. 10 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Michael F. & Andrew Goudie. (1985). Dambos, small channelless valleys in the tropics : characteristics, formation, utilisation. 2 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, Michael F.. (1977). Purpose, scale and method in land resource surveys. Geographia Polonia. 1 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Michael F., et al.. (1968). The Bagango valley: an example of land utilisation and agricultural practice in the Bamenda Highlands. 30(2). 655–681. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026