Public Health Research & Practice

419 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 419 papers published in Public Health Research & Practice in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Health Research & Practice usually cover General Health Professions (134 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (66 papers) and Health (66 papers) specifically the topics of Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (51 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (38 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Health Research & Practice are Fadwa Al‐Yaman, Ben J. Smith, Michelle H. Lim, Andrew Milat, Julie Leask, Julie Brimblecombe, Adrian Bauman, Steven Allender, Carmen Vargas and Jillian Whelan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Health Research & Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Health Research & Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Health Research & Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Public Health Research & Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Health Research & Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Health Research & Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Health Research & Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025