Countries where authors publish in Cellular Polymers
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cellular Polymers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cellular Polymers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular Polymers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cellular Polymers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cellular Polymers.
About Cellular Polymers
The 513 papers published in Cellular Polymers in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Cellular Polymers usually cover Polymers and Plastics (399 papers), Process Chemistry and Technology (39 papers) and Biomaterials (105 papers) specifically the topics of Polymer Foaming and Composites (286 papers), Polymer composites and self-healing (149 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (98 papers), Cellular and Composite Structures (78 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (58 papers), Flame retardant materials and properties (47 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (38 papers) and Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cellular Polymers are Denis Rodrigue, N. J. Mills, J. B. Choi, Roderic S. Lakes, Vipin Kumar, Chul B. Park, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez‐Pérez, Mehdi Barikani, C. Hepburn and Amir Hossein Behravesh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.