Public Budgeting &amp Finance

1.0k papers and 10.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Public Budgeting & Finance in the last decades have received a total of 10.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Budgeting & Finance usually cover Economics and Econometrics (678 papers), Political Science and International Relations (438 papers) and Accounting (123 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (424 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (404 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (367 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Budgeting & Finance are Daniel R. Mullins, Philip G. Joyce, Yilin Hou, Rebecca Hendrick, Justin Marlowe, Deborah A. Carroll, Xiaohu Wang, Paul L. Posner, Roy Bahl and Bruce A. Wallin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Budgeting &amp Finance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Budgeting &amp Finance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Budgeting &amp Finance.

Countries where authors publish in Public Budgeting &amp Finance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Budgeting &amp Finance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Budgeting &amp Finance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Budgeting &amp Finance more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025