PSL quarterly review

589 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 589 papers published in PSL quarterly review in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in PSL quarterly review usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (248 papers), Economics and Econometrics (241 papers) and Finance (173 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Policy (179 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (111 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PSL quarterly review are Félix Lutz, V. Tanzi, Jacob A. Bikker, Herbert G. Grubel, Eckhard Hein, Angus Maddison, Julio H. G. Olivera, S.C.W. Eijffinger, Don Patinkin and Mário Sarcinelli-Filho.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in PSL quarterly review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PSL quarterly review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PSL quarterly review.

Countries where authors publish in PSL quarterly review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PSL quarterly review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PSL quarterly review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PSL quarterly review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025