PharmacoEconomics - Open

452 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 452 papers published in PharmacoEconomics - Open in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in PharmacoEconomics - Open usually cover Economics and Econometrics (165 papers), Oncology (68 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (53 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (145 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (35 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PharmacoEconomics - Open are Björn Ekman, Shankar Prinja, Lars Holger Ehlers, Gary T. Ferguson, Melissa Roberts, Annie Hawton, Brian Godman, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Laura Downey and Panos Kanavos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in PharmacoEconomics - Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PharmacoEconomics - Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PharmacoEconomics - Open.

Countries where authors publish in PharmacoEconomics - Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PharmacoEconomics - Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PharmacoEconomics - Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PharmacoEconomics - Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025