Perspectives of New Music

854 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 854 papers published in Perspectives of New Music in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Perspectives of New Music usually cover Music (427 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (331 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (77 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (391 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (330 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Perspectives of New Music are Nelson Goodman, Edward T. Cone, Benjamin Boretz, David Lewin, Milton Babbitt, Suzanne G. Cusick, Stephen W. Smoliar, Douglas R. Hofstadter, Ian Quinn and John Backus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Perspectives of New Music

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Perspectives of New Music. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Perspectives of New Music.

Countries where authors publish in Perspectives of New Music

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Perspectives of New Music. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Perspectives of New Music with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perspectives of New Music more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025