Progress in Energy and Combustion ScienceUnited States
Annual Review of Fluid MechanicsUnited States
Applied Mechanics ReviewsUnited States
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid MechanicsChina
Archives of Computational Methods in EngineeringIndia
Theoretical and Computational Fluid DynamicsUnited States
Journal of Marine Science and TechnologyJapan
Journal of Ship ResearchUnited States
Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvellesFrance
Journal of TurbulenceUnited States
Progress in Energy and Combustion ScienceUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Progress in Aerospace Sciences · 1×
×0.626.2kAE
×1.975.3kCM
×3.437.7kME
×1.310.0kEE
×1.410.2kMM
Citations per year, relative to Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Progress in Aerospace Sciences · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Aerospace Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.