Praxis Educativa

592 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 592 papers published in Praxis Educativa in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Praxis Educativa usually cover Education (415 papers), Sociology and Political Science (286 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (98 papers) specifically the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (269 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (102 papers) and Rural and Ethnic Education (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Praxis Educativa are Joseph D. Novak, Alberto J. Cañas, Geraldina Porto Witter, Stephen J. Ball, Inés Dussel, Isabel Cristina de Moura Carvalho, Jefferson Mainardes, Antônio Joaquim Severino, Dalila Andrade Oliveira and Vicente Sisto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Praxis Educativa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Praxis Educativa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Praxis Educativa.

Countries where authors publish in Praxis Educativa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Praxis Educativa. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Praxis Educativa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Praxis Educativa more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025