Countries where authors publish in Political Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Political Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Political Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Political Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Political Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Political Science.
About Political Science
The 645 papers published in Political Science in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Political Science usually cover Public Administration (45 papers), Political Science and International Relations (177 papers), Communication (37 papers), Demography (57 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (153 papers) specifically the topics of New Zealand Economic and Social Studies (65 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (54 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (42 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (39 papers), Political Systems and Governance (39 papers), Social Media and Politics (32 papers), Australian History and Society (28 papers) and Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Political Science are Simon Chapple, Eugene Kamenka, Julia Schuster, Jack H. Nagel, Jon Barnett, Jack Vowles, Marian Sawer, Richard Mulgan, John Gould and Ron Johnston.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.