Pepperdine law review

468 papers and 833 indexed citations

About

The 468 papers published in Pepperdine law review in the last decades have received a total of 833 indexed citations. Papers published in Pepperdine law review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (177 papers), Law (122 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (111 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (104 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (53 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pepperdine law review are Stephen M. Bainbridge, Jack M. Balkin, Michael Heise, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Edward A. Luce, Henry F. Fradella, Josephine Gittler, Henry H Perritt, Seema Mohapatra and David P. Mathews.

In The Last Decade

Pepperdine law review

230 papers receiving 544 citations

Fields of papers published in Pepperdine law review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pepperdine law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pepperdine law review.

Countries where authors publish in Pepperdine law review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pepperdine law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pepperdine law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pepperdine law review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026