Countries where authors publish in Plant Reproduction
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Reproduction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Reproduction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Reproduction more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Reproduction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Reproduction.
About Plant Reproduction
The 295 papers published in Plant Reproduction in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Plant Reproduction usually cover Plant Science (250 papers), Horticulture (4 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (75 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Reproductive Biology (210 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (184 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (71 papers), Plant and animal studies (52 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (30 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (27 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (19 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Reproduction are Ivo Rieu, Marino B. Arnao, Josefa Hernández‐Ruíz, Florian Müller, Thomas Dresselhaus, Gianni Barcaccia, David Twell, Emidio Albertini, Kevin Begcy and Wim H. Vriezen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.