Phytochemistry Reviews

1.2k papers and 49.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Phytochemistry Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 49.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Phytochemistry Reviews usually cover Molecular Biology (623 papers), Plant Science (494 papers) and Pharmacology (182 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (145 papers), Biosynthesis and Engineering of Terpenoids (138 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytochemistry Reviews are Robert Verpoorte, John Ralph, Murray B. Isman, Toshiaki Umezawa, Véronique Cheynier, Anna‐Marja Aura, Virginia Lanzotti, Irma Podolak, İpek Süntar and Danuta Sobolewska.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Phytochemistry Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytochemistry Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytochemistry Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Phytochemistry Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytochemistry Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytochemistry Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytochemistry Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025