Applied Entomology and Zoology

4.0k papers and 49.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Applied Entomology and Zoology in the last decades have received a total of 49.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Entomology and Zoology usually cover Insect Science (3.1k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k papers) and Plant Science (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1.8k papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (932 papers) and Plant and animal studies (720 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Entomology and Zoology are Masayuki Sakuma, Tetsuo Gotoh, Jun Mitsuhashi, Masatoshi Hori, Akio Takafuji, Katsumi Togashi, Kazushige SOGAWA, Yasumasa KUWAHARA, Shoziro ISHII and Mitsuaki Shimazu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Entomology and Zoology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Entomology and Zoology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Entomology and Zoology.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Entomology and Zoology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Entomology and Zoology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Entomology and Zoology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Entomology and Zoology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025