Review of Business Management

563 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 563 papers published in Review of Business Management in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Business Management usually cover Strategy and Management (170 papers), Information Systems and Management (162 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (103 papers) specifically the topics of Business and Management Studies (125 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (46 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Business Management are Mohammad Tahlil Azim, Mônica Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu, Jeffrey S. Harrison, R. Edward Freeman, Elisa Baraibar‐Diez, Ladislao Luna Sotorrío, T. Ramayah, Francisco Liébana‐Cabanillas, Jorge Brantes Ferreira and Angilberto Sabino de Freitas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Business Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Business Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Business Management.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Business Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Business Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Business Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Business Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025