Pharmacy Practice

970 papers and 10.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 970 papers published in Pharmacy Practice in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmacy Practice usually cover Geriatrics and Gerontology (443 papers), General Health Professions (202 papers) and Family Practice (156 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (443 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (151 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacy Practice are Fernando Fernández-Llimós, Natalie A. DiPietro Mager, Beata Bajorek, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim, Subish Palaian, Roberto Pontarolo, Fernanda S. Tonin, Antonio M. Mendes, Maria Cordina and Inajara Rotta.

In The Last Decade

Pharmacy Practice

871 papers receiving 9.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Pharmacy Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacy Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacy Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacy Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacy Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacy Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacy Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026