Anatomical Science International

801 papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 801 papers published in Anatomical Science International in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Anatomical Science International usually cover Surgery (325 papers), Molecular Biology (128 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (91 papers) specifically the topics of Peripheral Nerve Disorders (65 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (57 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anatomical Science International are Tatsuo Sakai, Junko Nio‐Kobayashi, Atsuko Sato, Mohamed M. A. Abumandour, Balbir Singh, Kanchan Kapoor, Lorenzo Alibardi, Masanori Hirashima, Hidenori Aizawa and Keiichi Akita.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anatomical Science International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anatomical Science International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anatomical Science International.

Countries where authors publish in Anatomical Science International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anatomical Science International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anatomical Science International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anatomical Science International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025