Countries where authors publish in Intestinal Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intestinal Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intestinal Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intestinal Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Intestinal Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intestinal Research.
About Intestinal Research
The 859 papers published in Intestinal Research in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Intestinal Research usually cover Gastroenterology (94 papers), Genetics (333 papers), Epidemiology (188 papers), Surgery (206 papers) and Oncology (120 papers) specifically the topics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (327 papers), Microscopic Colitis (126 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (79 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (63 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (41 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (38 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (37 papers) and Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intestinal Research are Sung Hee Lee, Jeong Eun Kwon, Mi‐La Cho, Seung‐Hoon Lee, Sung Noh Hong, Sang Hoon Rhee, Otto S. T. Lin, Siew Chien Ng, Sunny Hei Wong and Jae Myung Cha.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.