Countries where authors publish in China Economic Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in China Economic Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in China Economic Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Economic Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in China Economic Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in China Economic Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in China Economic Journal.
About China Economic Journal
The 314 papers published in China Economic Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations . Papers published in China Economic Journal usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (101 papers), Finance (68 papers), Economics and Econometrics (160 papers), Development (14 papers) and Strategy and Management (54 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (59 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (54 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (39 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (34 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (31 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (28 papers), International Business and FDI (23 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in China Economic Journal are Yi Zeng, Fang Cai, Long Chen, Justin Yifu Lin, Yiping Huang, Xiaoyan Lei, Paul Hubbard, Wing Thye Woo, Chen Bai and Qiang Yao.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.