This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Panoeconomicus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Panoeconomicus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Panoeconomicus more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Panoeconomicus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Panoeconomicus.
About Panoeconomicus
The 549 papers published in Panoeconomicus in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Panoeconomicus usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (238 papers), Finance (207 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (328 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (141 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (134 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (90 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (86 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (60 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (58 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (44 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Panoeconomicus are Dani Rodrik, Vasiliki Makri, Αθανάσιος Τσαγκανός, Athanasios Bellas, Kenneth Rogoff, Carmen Reinhart, Philip Arestis, Kosta Josifidis, Γεώργιος Π. Κουρέτας and Prodromos Vlamis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.