Packaging Technology and Science

1.5k papers and 24.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Packaging Technology and Science in the last decades have received a total of 24.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Packaging Technology and Science usually cover Biomaterials (526 papers), Mechanics of Materials (494 papers) and Polymers and Plastics (239 papers) specifically the topics of Material Properties and Processing (462 papers), Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (388 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (172 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Packaging Technology and Science are S. Paul Singh, Yves Wyser, Jakob Lange, Zhiwei Wang, Vincent Rouillard, Caisa Andersson, Helén Williams, Gary Burgess, Joseph H. Hotchkiss and Rolf D. Joerger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Packaging Technology and Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Packaging Technology and Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Packaging Technology and Science.

Countries where authors publish in Packaging Technology and Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Packaging Technology and Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Packaging Technology and Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Packaging Technology and Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025