This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pachyderm. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pachyderm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pachyderm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Pachyderm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pachyderm.
About Pachyderm
The 650 papers published in Pachyderm in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Pachyderm usually cover Archeology (11 papers), Ecology (252 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (82 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (65 papers) and Developmental Biology (13 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (236 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (77 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (58 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (49 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (36 papers), Animal Diversity and Health Studies (32 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (30 papers) and Zoonotic diseases and public health (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pachyderm are Richard Hoare, Ferrel Osborn, Esmond Martin, Iain Douglas‐Hamilton, David Western, R. F. W. Barnes, Sally A. Lahm, Martin Tchamba, Keith Leggett and R.H. Emslie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.