Oxford Development Studies

About

The 695 papers published in Oxford Development Studies in the last decades have received a total of 17.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Oxford Development Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (302 papers), Economics and Econometrics (247 papers) and Safety Research (153 papers) specifically the topics of Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (145 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (121 papers) and Global trade and economics (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford Development Studies are Sanjaya Lall, Frances Stewart, Sabina Alkire, John H. Dunning, Rajneesh Narula, Augustin Kwasi Fosu, Xiaolan Fu, Stephen Devereux, Elisabeth Croll and Richard R. Nelson.

In The Last Decade

Oxford Development Studies

651 papers receiving 15.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Oxford Development Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford Development Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford Development Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Development Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Oxford Development Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford Development Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford Development Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026