Orthopedic Research and Reviews

248 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 248 papers published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews usually cover Surgery (185 papers), Epidemiology (58 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (44 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (49 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (43 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Orthopedic Research and Reviews are Kwok Chuen Wong, Ivan Vujaklija, Dario Farina, Oskar C. Aszmann, Stephanie Muh, Brad M. Isaacson, Sujee Jeyapalina, David L. Kaplan, Mark Eidelman and K. Pande.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Orthopedic Research and Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Orthopedic Research and Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orthopedic Research and Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025