Science and Global Security

272 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 272 papers published in Science and Global Security in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Science and Global Security usually cover Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (97 papers), Aerospace Engineering (83 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (81 papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear and radioactivity studies (96 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (79 papers) and Nuclear Issues and Defense (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science and Global Security are Frank von Hippel, Alexander Glaser, Jungmin Kang, Steve Fetter, Dean A. Wilkening, R. Kemp, Robert W. Nelson, James M. Acton, Jürgen Altmann and Robert Alvarez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science and Global Security

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science and Global Security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science and Global Security.

Countries where authors publish in Science and Global Security

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science and Global Security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science and Global Security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science and Global Security more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025