Journal of Orthopaedic Science

3.8k papers and 55.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science in the last decades have received a total of 55.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science usually cover Surgery (2.7k papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (690 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (654 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (673 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (568 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (565 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Orthopaedic Science are Katsuro Tomita, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Jun Iwamoto, Nobuhiko Sugano, Yoshiaki Toyama, Yukihide Iwamoto, Toshifumi Ozaki, Toshikazu Kubo and Eiji Itoi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Orthopaedic Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025