Medical Science Monitor

7.4k papers and 104.6k indexed citations

About

The 7.4k papers published in Medical Science Monitor in the last decades have received a total of 104.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Science Monitor usually cover Molecular Biology (1.8k papers), Surgery (1.7k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (427 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (364 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (249 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Science Monitor are George B. Stefano, Richard M. Kream, Ningxi Yang, Shiyue Li, Desheng Kong, Yan Zhang, Han Xiao, Zhaoyang Tan, Marios Loukas and Jongeun Yim.

In The Last Decade

Medical Science Monitor

7.1k papers receiving 102.4k citations

Countries where authors publish in Medical Science Monitor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Science Monitor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Science Monitor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Science Monitor more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Medical Science Monitor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Science Monitor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Science Monitor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026